-54. LOWER CAPITAL EXPENDITURES SINCE NO PARKING STRUCTURES ARE REQUIRED AND NORMAL SOILS CONDITIONS EXIST. (FOR A COMPARISON OF TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES SEE COST COMPARISON CHART). This site requires parking structures for 1,250 cars and requires extra expenditures for excavation and foundation due to difficult soils condition. 5. THE GENERAL ENVIRONMENT OF THIS SITE IS THAT OF A QUIET SUBURBAN SITE WITH SOUTHERN EXPOSURE AND PLEASANT VEGETATION. This site suffers somewhat from the noise of the Upper Levels, has good exposure but has apart from the area along the river no vegetation to speak of. 6. THE SITE IS CLOSE TO GOOD WINTER SPORTS FACILITIES AND IS LARGE ENOUGH TO PROVIDE FOR PLAYING FIELDS. Apart from the park walk along the river there is no room for recre;tional facilities. A P P E N D I X A -7$50,000.00 for improvement the 28 acres site should be valued at approximately $570,000.00. 3. ACC ESS I B I L I TY: When considering accessibility,to this site we must differen­ tiate between access during an interim period and access to the site after the proposed Taylor Way interchange has been constructed. (The Highways Department hopes that construc­ tion will take place within the next 5 to 10 years). In making any access proposal we must keep the interests of the Provincial Highways Department and the District of West Vancouver in mind. INTERIM PERIOD: During this period the intersection of 3rdStreet and the Upper Levels becomes critical in terms ofCollege access. 3 different proposals have been discussed in principle: a) Allowing no left turn at 3rdStreet North Vancouver traffic would turn right on 3rd and create no problem. West Vancouver traffic would turn right, go south on 3rd Street and get to the site via Keith Road and the existing alignment under the bridge. The Highways Department would accept this proposal. The district and especially the residents of the area will, however,. complain about the added traffic load. (300Cars/hours at peak hours in the first stage of College development). b) This proposal is similar, but suggests, however, a rerouting of the traffic south of th2 Upper Levels. Instead of going through the residential area a college access could run parallel to the Upper Levels north of theSpuraway Garden apartments and then use the alignment under the bridge to get to the site. This proposal requires negotiation with the owners of theSpuraway development and could be costly. We suggest, however, that this proposal be further inves­ tigated if the site is available. c) As far as the Highways Department is concerned a traffic light on 3rdStreet might be considered. This would be optimum as far as theCollege development is concerned. The solution would, however, be severely questioned by the District of West Vancouver. I -8PERMANENT COLLEGE ACCESS: The Provincial Highways Department indicated that the design of the proposed Taylor Way interchange would allow for a College access. The District, however, feels that the pro­ posed interchange would become inefficient if College traffic was superimposed on it. It was also indicated that this pro­ posal would result in an opposition from the residents along Mathers Avenue who already suffer from the traffic leading to the various church halls and the playing field. SUMMARY: In summing up the access issues we feel that a positive and direct kind of access to the College must be found. A traffic 1 ight at Upper Levels and 3rd Street would be such a direct kind of access for the interim period. Ideally this intersection would sooner or later be turned into a permanent College intersection. This permanent kind of intersection will, however, be in con­ flict with the.proposed Taylor Way interchange and would be opposed by the Provincial Highways Department. A recommendation of this site would, therefore, have to be based on the speculation that this proposed interchange could be sufficiently modified to provide proper College access and satisfy the requirements of other than College traffic. I I I A P P E N D I X B -9- C L E V E L A N D P A R K S I T E 1. AV AI LAB I L I TY: This site consists of a 75 acres portion owned by the Greater Vancouver Water District and a 25 acre portion to the east of it owned by the District of North Vancouver. (For a more detailed description of the site see 11Capi lano College Site Se 1 ection Study11 ). The Greater Vancouver Water District has confirmed their earlier statement and is willing to lease the 75 acre portion to the College. The District Manager of the District of North Vancouver informed us that the approximate 25 acres portion referred to would be disposed of on a tender basis but that the District has so far not decided to do so. A s far as the general question of locating a College in this area is concerned the Manager sees no problem except a possible earlier widening of Capilano Road. (For detailed discussion see 11A CCESSIBILIT Y11 ). 2. AC Q U I S I T I ON COST: The District of North Vancouver values the 25 acre portion at $500,000.00. It should be noted that sewer trunk lines in this area might be insufficient and that the College might have to contribute heavily to the estimated cost of $300,000 for a new trunk line. The Greater Vancouver Water District will lease the 75 acre portion of land to the College provided the College can solve any access problem in cooperation with the District of North Vancouver. The lease �ost would be based on a market value of $1.5 million to $2.0 million. The cost range is indicated since the Greater Vancouver Water District might be asked to contribute to road improvements as owner of the land. 3. AC C E S S I B I L I TY: Depending on the traffic peak hours of the College an earlier widening (earlier than would otherwise be the case) of Capilano Road might be necessary to accommodate the additional volume of traffic. The total cost of widening Capilano Road to a 4-lane road is estimated at $400,000.00. (The District owns the right of way for such a widening). Indications are that the District Council would look for a 50% contribution by the College or the Greater Vancouver Water District as owner of the land. coti\?.l.C.- co•-1..£:.:;;e: R'.l!2/A ;:oe 4000 ':>TuD�Tt> (u.:>u1y�:...Ll-l1 10 ?>.$ 4 �To2.c:."'t' e�,:x,t. ) o'?...i..t?.�, IN G. FOi:! Z5oo -'JTU�IJ16> �TA.ff I.JO f\..l.."'(lf-lC. f:'.l!:L-P::> BASIC ASSUMPTION • L!-':>::> c.otAf?t.C-i co:..L=-c,,::.. roQ1A ft)e 4oo::> "'1vD£1,..11', (SO<.JIYA'..t:.."-li 10 ::! "!, ?j'Ol2.�Y P.:,'..DC,�) • ?A::.l"):tJC. 2500 'i>lUDc.NT� t �TAFT • \.A1Jt7 fOI? f''...A'(ING flit.!,.o::, A'l'Al'..Al::':,1..£. &UT 1-Joj IIJC.\..UDE:.0 IN COe:,T 0Y.A.f'ARl':>O>-l 4 ro� . . WEST-VANCOUVER DUMP 305 ac� si1Q A":>':>U/I-S'110N':> l.11/\.liATION';> $ os..,c:::..1p11of� ACQUISITION cost = • :7 �,.:.::.::. :JU.:'.?-:.:�;_ �.coo 2.0i5'00 • 1i Actz::. P21VA�:. (.l8'.:,IJ�SO P�!Z. ACt?.:.) INC.L. IMPF'\M'T "' 2-ro,ooo PQOJ GOV'f. 'Doi:.t.1.,10...i • 2.':>ACC::S . ( A'c:>':>LJIA.E. 0 CLEVELAND PARK cost comP3rison �d on 52 ac,:e sitcz �llJ /NLLlON) O.S7o • �:.�::.e> O\! 2..o To 2.';, HJUJoi...i f.'.):::. ,.).;) .i..:::· • CD':11 O':>SO 11J r�1':> con--?.i-;1-1,v:. Af.lA.'..'f';,J'c:> b,l.';,'c.O O� t,\11'!. t,.c'Z.SAG:. t?.£.QU112£1A.<'.:t-l"( Of ?'2 ACC.£.? ( t?.C.. Ai�D 10 C0/1\{"Aq COL.LSC.E. fD'2JI.. - o.o�t;. 0.10s • '!> AC::.£.� (i'eE.ti:.1J1'--< 112.�C:.t, • 'h'lo ro 207. �LO?E. ) io P.)£. L.AlJ?C!Al"t.t>. F02. C.�1-.l<-�' !2£.c.. U':>S • � r., ".1.::.r.> f'A\/IIJ<>t , 7tf'J \';) c:ooq,, 1 ;;.1c.. e i ( ::� /i\l'....L.\Ot-4 ) l.oo - J.2S problems 0.200. 0.'2�0 SERVICES TO SITE l2U1'l�; LJIJV:, faz, AL..L. gas ,water; • ,W:'..QLJ:>.iE. ��\/IC.Eh lVillLM?LE. electricity, sewer STRUCTURES college bldgs -' G.,_,. • /A.AX. p_·_ D:..?T\.I It-I A'Z.:.A Of ::,,12uqut2.E.':> ?>0 1 TO 40 1 • 12:.t.\OI/A;.. o, ':)OIA'::. Fli..i- (µou<;i:.I.\O'..D G.l..l2..P:>.i...;::.) tz.;:.Q l t, SPECIAL REMARKS E & • A?PZOK. t? AC.2€:.':> f';>E.iV!.LlJ r.>:..oe,,1;, _ l!.fl!:IJ':)lVS u':>� - 115 °/., �'..Of't. • 25 % +l>,.:ZO ?AV:t-16 • 75 )%. fL.Af-lit.P AeSA ( INC!.., t,tRYIC e: 12 OA.0? ) • APP::20X. 21 AOZ.V;, re'-t:LN1L"I' 112.c.::.o .. 10% 70 /5 % ��o?;;:.. • 01..d C!2£.U') l'JCO':> .) • �0% A':>!"i,-\AL1 7Av. - IC!'-"r<:.Ot':>i, 11'&1..I')� • AJ.1..ov A=11, t;; .i.c :2.::.� i:-o::. ._ A"1D?'-A.7!.0 Ol'JIDll...!G !:>i21f'? 1?!:.i� = "1 ?A:2.l"}!i..lG. • ADS.QUA\E'.: 12UN"" �llJo. fOI:- 6A':> 1 'IIA1:.C. t- E.U:.qt:2,cq-< • �E.'11 �:.\IS� Li>.IS. C:.a'P (D\?1, or IJ0�1\,\ V:>.IJ. V-)illMiE.) o.�o .. 1.10 o.'2S - 0.?>5 • c;, oopoo ¢, 11..1 2 4 � -:;; la"'< 4�12 AIJGoUA!:.•11 o 000,000 ¢ IN � �4 -:.roeE.Y A�CANGC.IA!:>-IT� u.i....i,;, 10� 1".>L.O'-' co?T"'. Ut>1"1G, 100 E,!..C:X:. CO'>it> • 11:, o;. yo '20 •;. �- o pt- Pr ?!T!. • T!..12.12..s.ctD A12et:..i-.1Gr..1"::.i-Jt • r200F '=>ui:::,:.c� u'> .. o • ?"..lZ.\JIC.<'.. L..IN!!.h 11-!CL.., • �IZ.VICE. :.,1"1�'> INC.L.UDC.D • ',rf!. A1<£A ,ol?. e>�l7ti'> � OPa'..l,l, ':>?AC.E t,c:[ :.E:N 12. G.O - \!},&, I"- <..> o.o 1,; 0C> ' . '.:,.�.>S-.i.2.....J.----l-....:..·-'::.c·..:...:....._- -'--=--+---------+-------+-------1 • ?.},'Z.i".IIJG. j1'2.�1U::?.E. fO:Z.. 12?0 C.AQ':, ('I, OF f'AQ.l",ING 1<::.au1r-'E.tA.E:f.J1 ) E.� e>!..D structures • ,;o� Of bj:'.uC.f C:."- U\.JO RHO O 07s _ o.oes- IRED LE I ARCHITECT, CA ADIAN E VIRO MENTAL SCIE septem er 1969 updated march 1970 2.'2'$. 2.50 • �TAl.!Dt..12.D t-1oe.r1-1 CO/.JDl'pO>-l':> ',OIL. �-c:::,=:c:;:,ia:c"""'=-amo�-------1------S:, 15.155 17.955 -16.975 -19.805 0. ?,'? • .f;-50