The Internal Evaluation Committee began its work in April 1993. The function of the committee is to conduct an internal self assessment and report its findings to the College. To truly characterize our College the committee is comprised of a membership from all major constituent groups: Chairperson Richard Longworth local 2735 Student Society Tanja Giljevic local 2969 Instructional Divisions SIS John Brooks local 2787 Career/Voc. Pat Hodgson local 2581 Academic Crystal Hurdle local 2420 Staff Jeri Krogseth local 2542 Non-Instructional Divisions BAG Brenda Rovner local 2757 PEAC Peter Kellington local 2946 CCFA Ed Lavalle local 2954 OTEU none appointed Administration John Potts local 2988 Geoff Holter local 2991 Exempt Staff Judy Hafey local 2933 The evaluation process itself is intended to help our institution improve by: clarifying goals, identifying problems, examining the program and service review process, and identifying needed changes. The outcome of such a process will enhance the effectiveness of our institution. As a preliminary step the Committee reviewed recent provincial educational documents and compared these documents with the strategic plans of our College. In our analysis we reviewed the following provincial documents: Opening The Doors To Lifelong Learning:Empowering Undereducated Adults (PLAC), December 1989. Lifelong Learning for the 21st Century (Faris), March 1992. Participation in Adult Education in British Columbia, May 1992. ; Review of B.C. Student Assistance and Barriers to Post Secondary Participation (ORUM), September 1992. B.C. Human Resource Development Project (BCHRD), November 1992. Special Insert - Jan. 20/94 Interim Report from the Internal Evaluation Committee Report of the Consultation Steering Committee on B.C. Training and Adjustment Board, December 1992. Issues Affecting the Implementation and Use of Educational Technology April 1992. Client Survey Project, June 1992. Learning and Work: The Way Ahead for British Columbia (Strand), 1991. 1992 B.C. Colleges and Institutes Student Outcomes Report, 1993. A copy of each of these reports is available from your constituent representative. We encourage you to read these reports, and we welcome your input. We believe a review of these reports is essential since the Ministry has indicated it will utilize some of the findings to shape our educational future. From our readings, we identified twelve key issues. We selected these twelve after a careful examination and evaluation of the College's Mission and Values statement adopted in 1992 and the 3-Year Plan adopted 1990. See section on "Articulated in Mission/Values?" and "Articulated in the Three Year Plan" in the Issue Reports. The Committee suggests that each of these issues needs to be considered by the College. We need your feedback. Below are five questions that you will be asked to consider and answer at a later date. However you are not expected to respond at this time. We hope the twelve issues which follow will stimulate much discussion before we formally consult with you either individually or in a group setting.